<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is there a remote backup software that has 448-bit encryption?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://diskdatarecoveryservices.com/is-there-a-remote-backup-software-that-has-448-bit-encryption.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://diskdatarecoveryservices.com/is-there-a-remote-backup-software-that-has-448-bit-encryption.htm</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 10:02:31 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Pete S</title>
		<link>http://diskdatarecoveryservices.com/is-there-a-remote-backup-software-that-has-448-bit-encryption.htm/comment-page-1#comment-236</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 04:29:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://diskdatarecoveryservices.com/is-there-a-remote-backup-software-that-has-448-bit-encryption.htm#comment-236</guid>
		<description>The number of bits -- the &#34;key length&#34; -- depends on the method of encryption used. For example, using 448-bit RSA would provide negligible security; most RSA implementations use 2048-bit or 4096-bit key lengths.

However, using 448-bit Blowfish encryption would provide excellent protection. 128-bit or 256-bit AES encryption is a government standard, and provides fantastic security.

That said, you might try looking at the Mozy backup service. It costs money, but I've used it for years to good effect. All data is transferred securely and encrypted with 448-bit Blowfish.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The number of bits &#8212; the &quot;key length&quot; &#8212; depends on the method of encryption used. For example, using 448-bit RSA would provide negligible security; most RSA implementations use 2048-bit or 4096-bit key lengths.</p>
<p>However, using 448-bit Blowfish encryption would provide excellent protection. 128-bit or 256-bit AES encryption is a government standard, and provides fantastic security.</p>
<p>That said, you might try looking at the Mozy backup service. It costs money, but I&#8217;ve used it for years to good effect. All data is transferred securely and encrypted with 448-bit Blowfish.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: z☺☺mjet►►►</title>
		<link>http://diskdatarecoveryservices.com/is-there-a-remote-backup-software-that-has-448-bit-encryption.htm/comment-page-1#comment-237</link>
		<dc:creator>z☺☺mjet►►►</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 04:29:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://diskdatarecoveryservices.com/is-there-a-remote-backup-software-that-has-448-bit-encryption.htm#comment-237</guid>
		<description>Yes - Carbonite uses Blowfish 448 bit encryption
http://www.carbonite.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes - Carbonite uses Blowfish 448 bit encryption<br />
<a href="http://www.carbonite.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.carbonite.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://diskdatarecoveryservices.com/is-there-a-remote-backup-software-that-has-448-bit-encryption.htm/comment-page-1#comment-238</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 04:29:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://diskdatarecoveryservices.com/is-there-a-remote-backup-software-that-has-448-bit-encryption.htm#comment-238</guid>
		<description>Citadel Remote Backup is 448 Blowfish encrypted, so you'd be HIPAA and SOX (for public companies as well)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Citadel Remote Backup is 448 Blowfish encrypted, so you&#8217;d be HIPAA and SOX (for public companies as well)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
